Monday, June 4, 2012

Comparison of Ezra Pound’s “Hugh Selwyn Mauberley” to T.S. Eliot’s “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock”


T.S. Eliot’s “Prufrock” was written between 1910 and 1911, while Ezra Pound’s “Hugh Selwyn Mauberley” was written afterwards in 1920. Ezra Pound actually helped Eliot’s poem get published after he saw Eliot’s ability in the June 1915 issue of Poetry: A Magazine of Verse, marking the first time that Eliot had been published. Although Pound’s career had been going on for about 10 years at the time that Mauberley was published, Pound’s poem is considered a turning point in his career.
The first section of Mauberly is concerned with a poet who finds his life to have lost significance and is considered to be autobiographical. The poem seems to express Pound’s shock at the horrors of World War I and has themes of despair and materialism. Through the third person, Pound criticizes his past works as having the sole goal of gaining fame and recognition, but then shifts the focus to his defense. Eliot’s poem is written in the first person, and uses the character of Prufrock, which Pound likely thought of when titling his poem with a similar name. Prufrock is also characteristic of stream of consciousness, and presents themes of frustration, embarrassment, and decay.
Eliot’s “Prufrock” and Pound’s “Mauberley” are similar in that they are both representative of modernist poetry. Together, Eliot and Pound were two significant figures in the advancement of the modernist movement, and they both lived in England around the early 1900s and 1920s. Eliot’s poem begins with an excerpt from Dante’s “Inferno,” written in Latin, which, when translated, has the message of not being fearful of embarrassment. Pound’s “Mauberley” also uses samples from other languages, including a line from the song of Homer’s Sirens in Greek and a quoted epigraph in French signed at the bottom by Caid Ali, which might be a persona that Pound, or Mauberley, is using. In the first part of Mauberley Pound describes his outrage at World War I – “There died a myriad/And of the best, among them,/For an old bitch gone in the teeth,/For a botched civilization.” “Prufrock” has a similar sense of despair and negativity in the first stanza “restless nights in one-night cheap hotels /And sawdust restaurants with oyster-shells…Of insidious intent,” showing the dreariness of Prufrock’s surroundings. Later in the poem, Prufrock seems to be debating internally about talking to a woman – “And indeed there will be time /To wonder, ‘Do I dare?’ and, ‘Do I dare?’” and worrying about the possible embarrassment.
The second part of “Mauberley” begins in the third person and describes what Mauberley is thinking through clever analogy – “Unable in the supervening blankness/To sift TO AGATHON from the chaff/Until he found his seive.../ Ultimately, his seismograph.” Although both Ezra Pound’s poem and T.S. Eliot’s poem have been found to have some sort of message, this message is nearly impossible to discern by just a close reading. Because Eliot uses stream of consciousness, it is difficult to determine if something is meant to be interpreted literally or symbolically. It might be said that these poems, similar in their style and the eclectic nature of their stanzas, should be read as if all of the descriptions are unconnected symbols, which together could be interpreted to produce some sort of feeling – decay or angst – that might then be felt by the character – J. Alfred Prufrock and Hugh Selwyn Mauberley.

No comments:

Post a Comment